DiversityIslamMiddle EastPoliticsWest

The Dangerous Religion of Secularism

By Saturday 7 November 2020 No Comments

By: FARHAD KHOSROKHAVAR

Another string of jihadist attacks has shaken France. The most recent, at a church in Nice, left three people dead, only two weeks after a teacher was beheaded on the outskirts of Paris after he displayed cartoons of the prophet Mohammed in his classroom. Why is France targeted, over and over again, by violent extremists? Germany, England, Italy and even Denmark—where cartoons of controversial Mohammed were first published—have not seen comparable violence.

The reason is simple: France’s extreme form of secularism and its embrace of blasphemy, which has fuelled radicalism among a marginalised minority. Specifically, the latest round of violence follows the decision earlier this month by the satirical newspaper Charlie Hebdo to mark the beginning of a trial over a murderous attack on its newsroom in 2015 by republishing the blasphemous cartoons of Mohammed that prompted the original assault.

This duo—radical secularism and religious radicalism—have been engaged in a deadly dance ever since.

PROMOTING RELIGIOUS BLASPHEMY
Traditionally, French secularism requires the state to be neutral and calls for respect for religions in the public space, in order to avoid the rise of religious intolerance. In modern times, however, it has become something far more extreme. The moderate secularism that prevailed as recently as the 1970s has been replaced with something more like a civil religion.

It’s a belief system that has its own priests (government ministers), its pontiff (the president of the republic), its acolytes (intellectuals) and its heretics (anyone who calls for a less antagonistic attitude toward Islam is rejected and branded an “Islamo-leftist”).

One of the defining features of this new secularism is the promotion of religious blasphemy—and, in particular, its extreme expression in the form of caricatures like those of Mohammed.

This embrace was on full display following the murder of the teacher who showed cartoons of Mohammed in his classes, when many French intellectuals came out in praise of blasphemy and defended the government’s unequivocal defence of the right to free expression.

They should have considered their words more carefully.

In Western Europe the right to blaspheme is legally recognized. But it is one thing to protect the freedom to blaspheme and another to enthusiastically exhort blasphemy, as is the case in France.

Blasphemy is a non-argumentative and sarcastic form of free speech. It should be used, at best, with moderation in a country where between 6 percent and 8 percent of the population is Muslim, most of whose parents or grandparents emigrated from French colonies in North Africa.

Defenders of blasphemy invoke freedom of expression, but what blasphemy does, in fact, is trap France in a vicious cycle of reactivity to jihadist terror that makes it less free and less autonomous.

The immoderate use of caricatures in the name of the right to blaspheme ultimately undermines public debate: It stigmatises and humiliates even the most moderate or secular Muslims, many of whom do not understand French secularists’ obsessive focus on Islam, the veil, daily prayers or Islamic teachings.

The result is a harmful cycle: provocation, counter-provocation, and a society’s descent into hell. As French secularism has become radicalised, the number of jihadist attacks in the country has multiplied.

French secularists claim to be fighting for freedom of expression. As they do so, innocent people are dying, Muslims around the world are rejecting French values and boycotting the country’s products, and French Muslims are facing restrictions on their freedom of expression in the name of thwarting Islamist propaganda.

France is paying a heavy price for its fundamentalist secularism, both inside and outside its own borders.

Farhad Khosrokhavar
Franco-Iranian sociologist, director of studies at the École des hautes études en sciences sociales (EHESS). His research interests include the sociology of contemporary Iran and the social and anthropological problems of Islam in France. Last published work: La Radicalisation, éditions de la Maison des sciences de l’homme, coll “Interventions”, 2014.

source: orientxxi.info